Last updated: 11/04/2018 08:49:51

An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder

GSK study ID
LBI108884
Clinicaltrials.gov ID
EudraCT ID
Not applicable
EU CT Number
Not applicable
Trial status
Study complete
Study complete
Overview
Eligibility
Locations
Study documents
Results summary
Plain language summaries
Additional information

Trial overview

Official title: An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction and Convenience of Two Formulations of Lamotrigine in Subjects with a Mood Disorder
Trial description: To determine the convenience and satisfaction of new orally disintegrating tablet formulation (ODT) of lamictal in subjects with a mood disorder. This was a multicenter, open-label study in participants with a mood disorder, who reported difficulty or discomfort in swallowing the currently marketed IR compressed tablet formulation of lamotrigine and who had a person (such as a spouse, partner, companion, aid, nurse, caregiver, etc) willing to complete a Companion/Caregiver Question. Subjects were switched from the currently marketed lamotrigine IR formulation to a matching dose of lamotrigine IR orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) for 3 weeks to determine convenience and satisfaction.
Primary purpose:
Treatment
Trial design:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Allocation:
Non-randomized
Primary outcomes:

Mean change from baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) derived from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) using items 9 (ease of use), 10 (ease of planning to use), and 11 (convenience) at Week 3.

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Secondary outcomes:

Mean change from baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, from the TSQM using items 12 (confidence in medicine), 13 (certainty that good things about medication outweigh bad things), and 14 (satisfaction with medication) at Week 3

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Mean change from baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Mean change from baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score at Week 3

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "Did the tablets dissolve instantly (yes or no)?" at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the time it took the tablet to dissolve" at Week 3

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question “How did the dissolved tablet feel in your mouth?” at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "How satisfied were you with the flavor of the tablet?" at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "How would you rate the strength of the flavor of the tablet"? at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "How would you rate the aftertaste of the tablet"? at Week 3.

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "How satisfied were you with the aftertaste of the tablet"? at Week 3

Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how convenient or inconvenient did you find this orally disintegrating tablet"? at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Number of participants answering the question "Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how easy or difficult is it to use this orally disintegrating tablet?" at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Number of participants indicating a preference for ODT or the standard IR tablet at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Number of companions/caregivers indicating whether ODT or standard IR tablet is more convenient at Week 3

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Number of participants indicating at Week 3 (by answering yes/no) that they would be more likely to take the ODT formulation

Timeframe: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Interventions:
  • Drug: Lamotrigine
  • Enrollment:
    97
    Primary completion date:
    2008-20-02
    Observational study model:
    Not applicable
    Time perspective:
    Not applicable
    Clinical publications:
    Martha Sajatovic; Thomas R Thompson; Kevin Nanry; Suzanne Edwards . A Prospective, Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction and Convenience of Two Formulations of Lamotrigine in Subjects with Mood Disorders . Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:411-417.
    Medical condition
    Mood Disorders
    Product
    lamotrigine
    Collaborators
    Not applicable
    Study date(s)
    January 2008 to February 2008
    Type
    Interventional
    Phase
    3

    Participation criteria

    Sex
    Female & Male
    Age
    18+ years
    Accepts healthy volunteers
    No
    • Subject must have a documented diagnosis of a mood disorder as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV (296.00-296.90).
    • Subject must have a person (such as a spouse, partner, companion, aid, nurse, caregiver, etc) willing to complete a Companion/Caregiver Preference Question either in person or via the telephone. This individual must read, write, and comprehend English at a level sufficient to complete study-related assessments.
    • Subject has:
    • a current (or within six months prior to Screening) diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or bulimia.

    Trial location(s)

    Location
    Status
    Contact us
    Contact us
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23505
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27609
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Fairview Heights, Illinois, United States, 62208
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
    Status
    Study Complete
    Showing 1 - 6 of 18 Results

    Study documents

    Clinical study report
    Available language(s): English
    Scientific result summary
    Available language(s): English

    If you wish to request for full study report, please contact - [email protected]

    Results overview

    Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov

    Recruitment status
    Study complete
    Actual primary completion date
    2008-20-02
    Actual study completion date
    2008-20-02

    Plain language summaries

    Plain language summaries of clinical trial results for Phase 2-4 clinical trials that were initiated on or after January 2022 will be posted by GSK within one year following study completion.

    Additional information about the trial

    Participate in clinical trial
    Additional information
    Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.
    Click here
    Access to clinical trial data by researchers
    Visit website