Last updated: 07/29/2020 08:10:08

A Clinical Efficacy Study to Investigate the Effects of an Experimental Face Cream and Serum on Facial Redness and Barrier Function of the Skin

GSK study ID
202921
Clinicaltrials.gov ID
Not applicable
EudraCT ID
Not applicable
EU CT Number
Not applicable
Trial status
Completed
Completed
Overview
Eligibility
Locations
Study documents
Results summary
Plain language summaries
Additional information

Trial overview

Official title: A Clinical Efficacy Study to Investigate the Effects of an Experimental Face Cream and Serum on Facial Redness and Barrier Function of the Skin
Trial description: This is a single center, investigator-blind, intra and inter participant, parallel, randomized study to assess the effects of the test products that were prototypes (Physiogel Anti-Redness [AR] Face Cream and Serum) and the combination of AR Face Cream + AR Serum on facial redness and skin barrier function in healthy participants with red, dry skin.
Primary purpose:
Treatment
Trial design:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Allocation:
Randomized
Primary outcomes:

Standardized area under curve (AUC) (Baseline [BL]-29) in change from baseline in facial redness assessed by examiner for redness in Physiogel AR Face Cream versus untreated participants on Day 29

Timeframe: 30 minutes, 6 hours, day 2, day 15 and day 29

Secondary outcomes:

Standardized AUC(BL-29) in change from baseline in facial redness assessed by examiner in Physiogel AR Serum versus untreated participants on Day 29

Timeframe: 30 minutes, 6 hours, day 2, day 15 and day 29

Standardized AUC(BL-29) in change from baseline in facial redness assessed by examiner in treated versus untreated participants at Day 29

Timeframe: 30 minutes, 6 hour, day 2, day 15, day 29 and day 32

Change from baseline in a* value for redness using colorimeter on the face for treated versus untreated groups

Timeframe: At 30 minutes, 6 hours, Day 2, 15, 29 and 32

Standardized AUC(1-32) in change from baseline in facial dryness assessed by examiner in treated versus untreated participants at Day 32

Timeframe: At Baseline and Day 32

Standardized AUC(1-32) in change from baseline in facial dryness through participant self-assessment scores for treated versus untreated groups on Day 32

Timeframe: 30 minutes, 6 hour, day 2, day 15, day 29 and day 32

Standardized AUC(1-32) in change from baseline in facial redness through participant self-assessment scores for treated versus untreated groups on Day 32

Timeframe: 30 minutes, 6 hour, day 2, day 15, day 29 and day 32

Dermatologist assessment of global tolerability on the face for treated versus untreated groups on Day 29

Timeframe: At Day 29

Change in TEWL measurements of D-Squame discs following 2, 4 and 6 adhesive discs removal from face for the physiogel AR Face Cream group versus untreated groups on Day 29

Timeframe: At Day 29

Protein analysis of D-Squame discs (total of 6 adhesive discs) from face for the Physiogel AR Face Cream group versus untreated groups on Day 29

Timeframe: At Day 29

Change in skin hydration by Corneometer for Physiogel AR Face Cream versus untreated sites on the legs

Timeframe: At Day 2, 15, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34

Change from pre-challenge in TEWL measurements of D-Squame discs following 5, 10 and 15 D-Squame discs removal for Physiogel AR Face Cream versus untreated sites on the leg on Day 29

Timeframe: On Day 29 (including Pre-challenge)

To compare the skin hydration,TEWL, a* value for redness and examiner visual assessments of redness and dryness on Day 30 vs Day 29 for the Physiogel AR Face Cream versus untreated sites following a Sodium Lauryl Sulphate challenge

Timeframe: At Day 29 and Day 30 (at 15 minutes and 3 hours)

Standardized AUC(1-29) of change from baseline in TEWL on the leg for Physiogel AR Face Cream treated sites versus untreated sites

Timeframe: Day 2, 15 and 29

Protein analysis of D-Squame discs (total of 6 adhesive discs) from sites on the legs treated with Physiogel AR Face Cream versus untreated sites on Day 29

Timeframe: On Day 29

Interventions:
Other: No treatment
Other: Physiogel AR Face Cream + Serum
Other: Physiogel AR Face Cream
Other: Physiogel AR Serum
Enrollment:
129
Observational study model:
Not applicable
Primary completion date:
2013-18-12
Time perspective:
Not applicable
Clinical publications:
Not applicable
Medical condition
Skin Care
Product
Not applicable
Collaborators
Not applicable
Study date(s)
October 2013 to December 2013
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable

Participation criteria

Sex
Female
Age
18 - 65 Years
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
  • Consent: Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Age: Aged 18 to 65 years
  • Pregnancy: Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • Breast-feeding: Women who are breast–feeding.

Trial location(s)

Location
Status
Contact us
Contact us
Location
GSK Investigational Site
Schenefeld, Hamburg, Germany, 22869
Status
Study Complete

Study documents

Clinical study report
Available language(s): English
Protocol
Available language(s): English
Statistical analysis plan
Available language(s): English
Scientific result summary
Available language(s): English

If you wish to request for full study report, please contact - [email protected]

Results overview

Refer to study documents

Recruitment status
Completed
Actual primary completion date
2013-18-12
Actual study completion date
2013-18-12

Plain language summaries

Plain language summaries of clinical trial results for Phase 2-4 clinical trials that were initiated on or after January 2022 will be posted by GSK within one year following study completion.

Additional information about the trial

Participate in clinical trial
Additional information
Access to clinical trial data by researchers
Visit website