Efficacy and safety of GSK3196165 versus placebo and tofacitinib in participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to conventional synthetic (cs)/biologic (b) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)contRAst 2
Trial overview
Percentage (%) of participants with 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 12 superiority comparison with placebo (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage (%) of participants with 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) total score less than or equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low disease activity (LDA)] at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving 20% improvement in ACR20 at Week 24: non-inferiority comparison with tofacitinib (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving 50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria(ACR50/70) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving ACR50/70 at Week 24 and ACR20/50/70 Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving ACR50/70 at Week 24 and ACR20/50/70 Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving Disease Activity Score using 28 joint count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate (European league against rheumatism) EULAR response at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression Van der Heijde modified total sharp scores (mTSS) <= 0.5) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and week 12
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Short form (SF)-36 physical component scores at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 59
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter) (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of WBC count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of WBC count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 12 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Number of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 59
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: At baseline
Number of participants with anti-GSK3196165 antibodies (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) total score less than or equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low disease activity (LDA)] at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving 50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria(ACR50/70) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving Disease Activity Score using 28 joint count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate European league against rheumatism (EULAR) response at Week 12(Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression Van der Heijde modified total sharp scores (mTSS) <= 0.5) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving no radiographic progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and week 12
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Short form (SF)-36 physical component scores at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 59
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter) (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of WBC count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of WBC count, platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 12 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 24 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 24 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 12) and Week 24
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 for treatment arms who started study intervention from Day 1 (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4) and Week 52
Number of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 59
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: At baseline
Number of participants with anti-GSK3196165 antibodies (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Up to Week 59
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 59
Number of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities for placebo switched arms (Global Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 59
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 59
Number of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities for placebo switched arms (Asia Cohort)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 59
- Key inclusion criteria
- >=18 years of age
- >=18 years of age
- Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age
- Has active disease, as defined by having both* − >=6/68 tender/painful joint count (TJC), and − >=6/66 swollen joint count (SJC)
- Has at least 1 bone erosion present on hand/wrist or foot radiographs
- Has had an inadequate response to one or two of the csDMARDs: o methotrexate (MTX) 15–25 mg/week** oral or injected o hydroxychloroquine up to 400 mg/day or chloroquine up to 250 mg/day o sulfasalazine up to 3000 mg/day o leflunomide up to 20 mg/day*** o bucillamine up to 100 mg/day (or up to 300 mg/day if permitted per local requirement) o iguratimod up to 50 mg/day * If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC. ** A lower dose of 7.5 mg/week is acceptable if reduced for reasons of intolerance to MTX or per local requirement. *** Concomitant use of leflunomide and methotrexate is not allowed, for safety reasons. Key exclusion criteria
- History of other inflammatory rheumatologic or systemic autoimmune disorder, other than Sjögren’s syndrome secondary to RA, that may confound the evaluation of the effect of the study intervention.
- Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections.
- Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (either experimental or approved).
Key inclusion criteria
Trial location(s)
Study documents
If you wish to request for full study report, please contact - [email protected]
Results overview
Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov
Plain language summaries
To view plain language summaries on trialsummaries.com click here.