Last updated: 11/03/2018 21:37:53

Patient Preference Study of Fluticasone Furoate and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Sprays

GSK study ID
201474
Clinicaltrials.gov ID
EudraCT ID
Not applicable
EU CT Number
Not applicable
Trial status
Study complete
Study complete
Overview
Eligibility
Locations
Study documents
Results summary
Plain language summaries
Additional information

Trial overview

Official title: A Patient Preference Evaluation Study of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Subjects with Allergic Rhinitis
Trial description: The purpose of this study is to provide information on whether subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) prefer the administration of fluticasone furoate (FF) nasal spray or mometasone furoate (MF) nasal spray based on how the products feel to the subjects when administered.
This Phase IV interventional study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, cross-over subject preference study to evaluate and compare patient preference for FF [(total dose of 110 microgram (mcg)] and MF (total dose of 200 mcg) nasal sprays in subjects with allergic rhinitis. These two commonly used nasal sprays use different actuation systems (FF nasal spray is side-actuated; MF nasal spray is top-actuated) and this study will evaluate whether this difference is reflected in the patient-assessed attributes of the two nasal sprays. The attributes or properties which are being assessed by the subjects for these nasal sprays include smell, taste & aftertaste, drip down the throat, run out of the nose, urge to sneeze, and irritation.
The single-day study per subject comprises screening and all treatments and procedures. Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a cross-over treatment schedule so that all subjects receive both products. One group of subjects will have two sprays of FF administered in each nostril whilst a second group will have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril. At 30 (± 5) minutes after the first study medication treatment, the two groups will switch. The first group will then have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril and the second group will then have two sprays of FF administered into each nostril. After each treatment the subject will complete two sets of attributes questionnaires (‘immediate’ and ‘delayed’). A subject-rated ‘immediate’ attributes questionnaire will be completed immediately following each treatment and a subject-rated ‘delayed’ attributes questionnaire will be completed approximately 2 minutes after each treatment. Upon completion of the second set of these two attributes questionnaires (immediate and delayed), a preference questionnaire will be completed by the subject. In the preference questionnaire, the subject states their preferred treatment, if any, for each of the product attributes, and finally states their overall preferred treatment, if any.
There will be follow-up contact with the subject 24 (± 4) and 96 (± 4) hours after administration of the last treatment. The study is planned to enroll about 300 subjects.
Primary purpose:
Other
Trial design:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Allocation:
Randomized
Primary outcomes:

Number of participants with overall preference for nasal spray assessed by preference questionnaire.

Timeframe: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment

Secondary outcomes:

Number of participants with preference for individual nasal spray attributes assessed by preference questionnaire

Timeframe: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding scent/odor

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding satisfaction with scent/odor

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding satisfaction not to have scent/odor

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding immediate taste.

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding satisfaction with immediate taste.

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding medicine running down throat

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding medicine running out of nose.

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding soothing

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the immediate attributes question regarding sneezing

Timeframe: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding scent/odor.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding satisfaction with scent/odor.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding satisfaction not to have scent/odor.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding aftertaste.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding satisfaction with aftertaste.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding medicine running down throat.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding smedicine running out of nose.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding soothing.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding nasal irritation.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding bothersome nasal irritation.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding satisfaction with product.

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Number of participants responding to the delayed attributes question regarding likeliness to comply if prescribed

Timeframe: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2

Interventions:
  • Drug: FF nasal spray
  • Drug: MF nasal spray
  • Enrollment:
    300
    Primary completion date:
    2015-08-06
    Observational study model:
    Not applicable
    Time perspective:
    Not applicable
    Clinical publications:
    Meltzer EO, Bardelas J, Goldsobel A, Kaiser H. A preference evaluation study comparing the sensory attributes of mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays by patients with allergic rhinitis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4:289–296.
    Meltzer EO, Stahlman JE, Leflein J, Meltzer S, Lim J, Dalai AA, Prillaman BA, Philpot E. Preference of adult patients with allergic rhinitis for the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate nasal sprays: A randomised, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study. Clin Ther 2008;30:271-279.
    Sher ER, Ross JA. Intranasal corticosteroids: The role of patient preference and satisfaction. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014;35:S24–S33.
    Anahi Yanez; Peter Bremner; Chae-Seo Rhee; Alex Dimitroff; Neil Johnson; Graham Luscombe; Barbara A Prillaman. A patient preference study that evaluated fluticasone furoate and mometasone furoate nasal sprays for allergic rhinitis. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2016;7(4):e183-e192(10).
    Medical condition
    Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal
    Product
    fluticasone furoate
    Collaborators
    Not applicable
    Study date(s)
    March 2015 to June 2015
    Type
    Interventional
    Phase
    4

    Participation criteria

    Sex
    Female & Male
    Age
    18 - 65 years
    Accepts healthy volunteers
    No
    • Male or female subjects who are between 18 to 65 years of age, inclusive at the time of signing the informed consent.
    • Severity of disease: Subjects who meet the below criteria and who may also have vasomotor rhinitis are eligible for the study. A positive skin test to perennial (for example, but not limited to, animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mould) and / or seasonal (for example, but not limited to, grass, tree, weed, ragweed) allergen within 12 months prior to Screening. If a subject has not been tested in the 12 months prior to Screening, a positive skin test (by prick method) is required at Screening. A positive skin test is defined as a wheal >=3 millimeters (mm) larger than the diluent control for prick testing. In vitro tests for specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) [such as radioallergosorbent test (RAST), paper radioimmunosorbent test (PRIST)] will not be allowed as a diagnosis of AR.
    • Concurrent conditions / Medical History: Concomitant medical conditions defined as but not limited to a historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema, uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation, or compromise the scientific validity of the study; A respiratory infection at time of study participation; A condition associated with anosmia (loss of smell) and ageusia (loss of taste) within 2 weeks of study – may be self-reported condition experienced by the subject; Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose or oropharynx; Acute rhinosinusitis within 60 days of screening; Current severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation or nasal trauma or nasal ulcers; History of haemorrhagic diathesis, atrophic rhinitis, or recurrent nasal bleeding which may, in the opinion of the investigator, impact on the safety of the subject or the scientific validity of the study; Nasal biopsy within 60 days of screening; Nasal jewellery or piercings which could impact nasal safety or airway resistance; Rhinitis medicamentosa within 60 days of screening; History of glaucoma, cataracts or raised intraocular pressure.
    • Concomitant medications: Use of intranasal corticosteroids (FF, MF or others) within 4 weeks of study participation; Recent or ongoing use of a corticosteroid by a non-nasal route which, in the opinion of the investigator, could preclude subject participation in the study; Use of intranasal medications (including intranasal antihistamines, intranasal decongestants, intranasal saline) within 1 week of study participation; Use of medications which, in the opinion of the investigator, could disturb the taste or smell faculties of the subject; Use of any medications that significantly inhibit the cytochrome P450 (CYP) sub-family CYP3A4, including but not limited to ritonavir and ketoconazole, within 4 weeks of study participation.

    Trial location(s)

    Location
    Status
    Contact us
    Contact us
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, South Korea, 08308
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia, 2450
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1426ABP
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Moscow, Russia, 123182
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina, M5500CCG
    Status
    Study Complete
    Location
    GSK Investigational Site
    Incheon, South Korea, 405-760
    Status
    Study Complete
    Showing 1 - 6 of 12 Results

    Study documents

    Clinical study report
    Available language(s): English
    Scientific result summary
    Available language(s): English
    Protocol
    Available language(s): English

    If you wish to request for full study report, please contact - [email protected]

    Results overview

    Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov

    Recruitment status
    Study complete
    Actual primary completion date
    2015-08-06
    Actual study completion date
    2015-08-06

    Plain language summaries

    Plain language summaries of clinical trial results for Phase 2-4 clinical trials that were initiated on or after January 2022 will be posted by GSK within one year following study completion.

    Additional information about the trial

    Participate in clinical trial
    Additional information
    Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.
    Click here
    Access to clinical trial data by researchers
    Visit website